Arcadia’s $3.6M Exploit and How Olympix Would Have Prevented It
The Arcadia exploit wasn’t just a $3.6 million bug. It was a two-day, multi-phase takedown that turned the protocol’s own defenses into weapons. Circuit breakers became blindfolds. Flashloans became cloaks. And a single unchecked router call punched straight through the Rebalancer contract’s core logic.
This wasn’t a novel vulnerability. It was an architectural oversight; missed not just by Arcadia Finance, but by four different audit firms. The root cause was a lack of input validation, embedded in a high-privilege function, that assumed external routers were safe by default.
In an ecosystem obsessed with zero-days and reentrancy, the Arcadia exploit is a reminder: most losses come from old failures wearing new disguises.
This postmortem dissects exactly how the Arcadia exploit unfolded, why audits failed to catch it, and what design decisions put the protocol in the blast radius. Builders, this one’s for you.
Exploit Overview: How the Arcadia Exploit Drained $3.6M in Minutes
The Arcadia exploit executed at 4:05 AM UTC on July 15, 2025, targeting Arcadia Finance’s Rebalancer contract on the Base blockchain. Within minutes, $3.6 million worth of USDC and USDS were drained, swapped into WETH, and bridged to Ethereum through fresh intermediary addresses to obfuscate the trail.
Despite Arcadia’s built-in circuit breakers — designed to halt suspicious behavior — the exploit ran uninterrupted. Why? Because the attacker had pre-triggered the circuit breaker 20 hours earlier, baiting the team into unpausing the protocol. This unpause activated a cooldown period, rendering the protocol unable to pause again when the real exploit began.
Here’s the full attack window:
July 14, 9:22 AM UTC: Attacker deploys “suspicious” contracts that trigger the circuit breaker.
July 14, 1:05 PM UTC: Arcadia team unpauses the protocol, initiating cooldown.
July 15, 4:05 AM UTC: Real exploit begins.
July 15, 4:25 AM UTC: Team responds — too late. Funds already gone.
The Arcadia exploit wasn’t a smash-and-grab. It was a surgical, two-day operation exploiting flawed assumptions in both code and system design.
Kill Chain Breakdown: How the Arcadia Exploit Was Engineered Over Two Days
Phase 1: Conditioning the Protocol
The Arcadia exploit didn’t start with an attack. It started with a setup.
On July 14 at 9:22 AM UTC, the attacker deployed malicious contracts that intentionally tripped Arcadia’s circuit breakers. The protocol correctly paused within seconds, exactly as designed.
But the attacker knew Arcadia’s safety logic better than Arcadia did. After four hours of internal review, the Arcadia team deemed the contracts non-malicious and unpaused the system. This seemingly harmless action triggered a cooldown period, a governance safeguard that prevented the protocol from pausing again for several hours.
This cooldown wasn’t a bug. It was a design feature. But on July 15, it became a liability.
Phase 2: Executing the Arcadia Exploit
At 4:05 AM UTC on July 15, with the cooldown still active, the real attack began:
Flashloan Setup: The attacker borrowed $1.5 billion via Morpho Blue to simulate legitimate liquidity and fuel the exploit.
Account Conditioning: Used flashloan proceeds to repay victim debts, making vaults “healthy” and sidestepping failsafes.
Malicious Router Injection: Called rebalance() on target vaults with crafted swapData, injecting their own contract as the swap router.
Privilege Escalation: Because the router was implicitly trusted, the attacker’s contract executed with Rebalancer-level privileges.
Fund Drainage: With access control bypassed, they:
Extracted LP tokens from victim accounts
Unwound positions into underlying assets
Repaid the flashloan
Bridged out with ~$3.6M in WETH
No reentrancy. No price oracle games. Just a complete failure of input validation and privilege separation, wrapped inside a rigged cooldown window.
Root Cause Analysis: Why the Arcadia Exploit Worked
Core Technical Flaw: Unvalidated External Calls
At the heart of the Arcadia exploit was a single unforced error: the swapViaRouter() function blindly trusted that any router address passed to it would be safe.
That assumption was fatal.
The attacker injected their own contract as the router inside a call to rebalance(). This contract inherited Rebalancer privileges and executed arbitrary logic under the protocol’s full trust. No validation, no whitelisting, no guardrails.
The unchecked path:
Rebalancer.rebalance()
→ AccountV1.flashAction()
→ actionTarget.executeAction()
→ _swap()
→ swapViaRouter()
→ router.call(data)
This is textbook privilege escalation: a low-trust input (router address) ends up controlling a high-privilege function. Once swapViaRouter handed off execution, it was game over.
Systemic Design Failure: Cooldown as an Attack Vector
The cooldown period (intended to prevent governance attacks) created a 20-hour window where circuit breakers couldn’t function. The attacker gamed it by intentionally triggering a false positive the day before.
By the time the real exploit began, Arcadia’s only line of defense was disabled by design.
Audit Oversight
The Rebalancer contract, where the Arcadia exploit originated, was excluded from scope in three of four audits. The one firm that reviewed it flagged a similar pattern — but dismissed the risk without modeling this exact call path.
When validation assumptions go unchecked and scope is siloed, attackers win.
Static Analysis: The Arcadia Exploit Shouldn’t Have Been a Surprise
Olympix static analysis flagged the final choke point of the Arcadia exploit: a high-privilege call() to an unvalidated router address with unchecked payload data. This is where the exploit converged — and where most tools, audits included, historically fail to catch cascading privilege flows.
But static analysis alone only lit up the tail end. The full path to exploitation required deeper, context-aware analysis. That’s where Olympix tooling went further; surfacing interconnected risk patterns across the Rebalancer contract:
Unrestricted external calls to strategyHook, router, account, and pool
Invariant-breaking reentrancy and callback paths
Bypassable mutex logic tied to ERC20/ERC721 behavior
Trust assumptions around account ownership, factory origin, and return data integrity
In isolation, each of these issues might appear benign. Together, they formed the exact shape of a protocol-level privilege escalation.
Olympix would have caught this; not by guessing the attacker’s payload, but by structurally invalidating the trust model that enabled it. That’s what modern security tooling is supposed to do.
Uncover vulnerabilities early with Olympix’ free static analyzer. Trusted by over 30% of Solidity developers. Easy to use. Proven. Ready for your code. Get started for FREE!
Security Lessons: What the Arcadia Exploit Should Teach Every Protocol
1. Input Validation Is Non-Negotiable
Never trust an external address in a high-privilege context without strict validation. The Arcadia exploit weaponized a router field meant for DEX calls — but no check ensured the router was actually a DEX.
Lesson: Always whitelist critical addresses. If that’s infeasible, enforce interface checks, revert on unknown selectors, and log address changes with circuit-breaker triggers.
2. Privilege Separation Must Be Explicit
The attacker’s router contract inherited the full privileges of the Rebalancer simply by being passed into call(). This broke the implicit trust model and allowed access control to collapse.
Lesson: Never delegate execution without explicit capability scoping. If a contract is calling into another, ensure only low-privilege actions are possible; even in success paths.
3. Safety Mechanisms Can Be Attack Surfaces
Arcadia’s circuit breaker cooldown, designed as a defense, became a liability. The attacker pre-triggered the defense to ensure it couldn’t activate when needed.
Lesson: If a system can only detect after a threat begins, ensure it can re-engage defenses at any time. Add override paths. Don’t hard-code blind spots.
4. Audit Scope Isn’t a Safety Guarantee
Three audits never looked at the vulnerable contract. The one that did, underestimated the path to exploitability. Even comprehensive audits aren’t immune to blind spots.
Lesson: Use audits as validation, not detection. Pair them with continuous analysis and scoped tooling that doesn’t rely on human prioritization to surface critical logic flaws.
5. Time-To-Detection Determines Loss
The Arcadia exploit ran for 20 minutes before any team response. A real-time alerting system could have stopped the attack by minute two. That’s a $3.6M difference.
Lesson: Detection speed is security. Monitoring isn’t optional — it’s the last line of defense before capital loss.
Actionable Recommendations: How to Prevent the Next Privilege Escalation Exploit
1. Lock Down External Inputs
Whitelist DEX routers and strategy contracts at the protocol level
Enforce interface compliance with runtime checks before delegation
Avoid call() unless absolutely necessary. Use known interfaces.
When delegation is required, strip privileges — no msg.sender privilege inheritance
Implement return-data validation to catch malformed or malicious payloads
3. Fortify Safety Mechanisms
Cooldowns should degrade gracefully, not block emergency responses
Implement override pathways for critical actions (e.g. admin circuit-breaker bypass)
Trigger alerts on cooldown activation or repeated toggling
4. Bake Security Into the Dev Cycle
Run deep static analysis on every contract, especially those handling funds
Treat mutation testing and privilege path tracing as CI requirements
Don’t wait for audits — verify continuously
5. Monitor Like It’s Production
Real-time alerts on:
Flashloan activity spikes
Suspicious router or strategy registration
Unusual rebalances or liquidity drains
Use time-based invariants: if behavior deviates from normal usage patterns, trigger pause
6. Treat Audit Scope as a Risk Map
Every unaudited line of code is an unmodeled liability
Don’t ship features with external call paths that weren’t reviewed end-to-end
Use audit diffs and scoped tool coverage to track blind spots
Conclusion: The Arcadia Exploit Wasn’t Unique — That’s the Problem
The Arcadia exploit didn’t require exotic tooling or undiscovered opcodes. It required a series of old, fixable mistakes:
Trusting unvalidated external input
Delegating privileges without guardrails
Designing safety mechanisms without adversarial modeling
Relying on audit scope instead of architectural verification
This was preventable. And that’s what makes it dangerous.
Every protocol with flashloan exposure, router delegation, or pause-based protections is at risk if they haven’t modeled these patterns end-to-end. The next $3.6M loss won’t look like Arcadia, but it’ll rhyme.
Builders, don’t wait for the audit to catch what your test suite and tooling should’ve surfaced weeks ago. Design like you’re being targeted. Because you are.
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.
Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.
Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.
In Brief
Remitano suffered a $2.7M loss due to a private key compromise.
GAMBL’s recommendation system was exploited.
DAppSocial lost $530K due to a logic vulnerability.
Rocketswap’s private keys were inadvertently deployed on the server.
Hacks
Hacks Analysis
Huobi | Amount Lost: $8M
On September 24th, the Huobi Global exploit on the Ethereum Mainnet resulted in a $8 million loss due to the compromise of private keys. The attacker executed the attack in a single transaction by sending 4,999 ETH to a malicious contract. The attacker then created a second malicious contract and transferred 1,001 ETH to this new contract. Huobi has since confirmed that they have identified the attacker and has extended an offer of a 5% white hat bounty reward if the funds are returned to the exchange.
